+1 to remove if really "it opens up the potential for things to not work
properly."
And of course unless the creator of this option explains the need
Also what attributes will be removed exactly?
Note: I did not find any "error-message" string in *.xml files in trunk
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <[email protected]>
While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error
message handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential
for things to not work properly.
You can specify the name of the error message list in the
<simple-method> element. You can also specify the name of the error
message list in some of the method operations that generate error
messages. I am not sure what purpose that serves. The event and service
engines will retrieve the error message list specified in the
<simple-method> element - any other error message lists that were
created by method operations are ignored.
In the existing Mini-language code there are only a handful of method
operations that specify the error message list name, and in all of those
cases the default name is used - effectively doing nothing. I would like
to remove the capability to specify the error message list name in all
of the method operations. Instead, method operations that generate
errors will use the error message list name defined in the enclosing
<simple-method> element.
What do you think?
-Adrian
