The interesting side effect of this change is it causes tests to fail -
because errors were being ignored, so the tests passed.
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 12:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error
message handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential
for things to not work properly.
You can specify the name of the error message list in the
<simple-method> element. You can also specify the name of the error
message list in some of the method operations that generate error
messages. I am not sure what purpose that serves. The event and
service engines will retrieve the error message list specified in the
<simple-method> element - any other error message lists that were
created by method operations are ignored.
In the existing Mini-language code there are only a handful of method
operations that specify the error message list name, and in all of
those cases the default name is used - effectively doing nothing. I
would like to remove the capability to specify the error message list
name in all of the method operations. Instead, method operations that
generate errors will use the error message list name defined in the
enclosing <simple-method> element.
What do you think?
-Adrian
