Ok, it happened to be a local change, sorry for the confusion. Jacopo
On May 16, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Ha sorry no, there is also r1339079, OK running test here anyway... > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> >> You mean r1339089, right? >> Jacques >> From: "Adrian Crum" <[email protected]> >>> I ran tests before committing rev 1339079 and they all passed. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> On 5/16/2012 10:43 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>> I see 12 failures when I run tests on trunk locally; however I have some >>>> local changes that *shouldn't* cause these failures. >>>> Am I the only one? I will check my code regardless but in the meantime it >>>> would help if any of you could comment if you see issues. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Jacopo >>
