Hi Jacopo, nope the branch is up to date so i don't lose anything if you remove it.
2012/5/31 Jacopo Cappellato <[email protected]>: > Thank you Sascha, > > please see inline: > > On May 31, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> sry for the late response. >> >> The new branch is for the further jackrabbit / ofbiz integration, to >> keep the new experimental features away from the trunk until they work >> reliable. I didn't remove the jcr code form the trunk because the >> basic content repository functionality works and can be used. >> >> But it seems that not many people are interested in the JCR feature >> (or haven't time to support it). So it's ok to me to remove it from >> the trunk for now. > > My concern is not on the number of people interested that could grow over > time but on the fact that the code in trunk is still too > experimental/incomplete (I have mentioned a few issues earlier in this > thread): this is why I think that at the moment the release branch would be a > better place for it. > If I will find time to remove it will be fine or you will loose any work? I > mean, is the branch updated or do you have a good checkout of your code? > > Regards, > > Jacopo > > >> >> Regards >> Sascha >> >> 2012/5/26 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]>: >>> +1 >>> >>> I saw that Sascha did it already at >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332706&view=rev >>> I don't know why he did not remove from trunk... >>> >>> Sascha? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk: >>>> * it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik >>>> apart from some examples in the "example" component) >>>> * the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or >>>> enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be defined >>>> * a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not >>>> ready for distribution: several files are missing the license header (have >>>> they been copied?) >>>> * most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files >>>> * logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we >>>> do not have proper configuration in log4j for it) >>>> * the development on it is staling >>>> >>>> In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch. >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sascha Rodekamp >> Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz >> Lynx-Consulting GmbH >> Johanniskirchplatz 6 >> D-33615 Bielefeld >> http://www.lynx.de > -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de
