Thank you Sascha, please see inline:
On May 31, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: > Hey guys, > sry for the late response. > > The new branch is for the further jackrabbit / ofbiz integration, to > keep the new experimental features away from the trunk until they work > reliable. I didn't remove the jcr code form the trunk because the > basic content repository functionality works and can be used. > > But it seems that not many people are interested in the JCR feature > (or haven't time to support it). So it's ok to me to remove it from > the trunk for now. My concern is not on the number of people interested that could grow over time but on the fact that the code in trunk is still too experimental/incomplete (I have mentioned a few issues earlier in this thread): this is why I think that at the moment the release branch would be a better place for it. If I will find time to remove it will be fine or you will loose any work? I mean, is the branch updated or do you have a good checkout of your code? Regards, Jacopo > > Regards > Sascha > > 2012/5/26 Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]>: >> +1 >> >> I saw that Sascha did it already at >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332706&view=rev >> I don't know why he did not remove from trunk... >> >> Sascha? >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[email protected]> >> >>> Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk: >>> * it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik >>> apart from some examples in the "example" component) >>> * the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or >>> enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be defined >>> * a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not >>> ready for distribution: several files are missing the license header (have >>> they been copied?) >>> * most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files >>> * logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we >>> do not have proper configuration in log4j for it) >>> * the development on it is staling >>> >>> In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch. >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > > Sascha Rodekamp > Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz > Lynx-Consulting GmbH > Johanniskirchplatz 6 > D-33615 Bielefeld > http://www.lynx.de
