On Jun 8, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > for only 2 parameters create a new properties file looks to me a bit too > much....
Yes, you are right Hans; when I wrote I was thinking that the file already existed (I got confused with fop.xconf). Jacopo > > On 06/04/2012 05:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:33 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties?rev=1345849&r1=1345848&r2=1345849&view=diff >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties (original) >>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/config/url.properties Mon Jun 4 07:33:24 >>> 2012 >>> @@ -43,3 +43,9 @@ link.remove_lsessionid.user_agent_list = >>> # Should HTTP parameters sent to services require encryption? >>> # This is generally advised for more secure webapps as it makes it more >>> difficult to spoof requests (XSRF) that change data. >>> service.http.parameters.require.encrypted=Y >>> + >>> +# FOP configurable folder >>> +fop.path=component://webapp/config >>> +# Font path for FOP >>> +fop.font.base.path=component://webapp/config/ >>> + >> >> Hans, >> >> why are you using this file and not fop.properties? >> >> Jacopo >> >
