I agree with Hans.

2012/7/27 Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>

> I don't agree that a job interview is just another communication event.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On 7/27/2012 7:59 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>
>> Adrian,
>>
>> Just telling me it should stay, is not enough, you have to provide
>> reasoning for that.
>>
>> my opinion  is that a job interview is just a communication event of the
>> new type 'Jobinterview' with the roles already there. A job interview can
>> then already relate to other communication events of type email or
>> others.....
>>
>> Hans
>>
>> On 07/27/2012 01:46 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> I agree that employee leave belongs in the Work Effort entities.
>>>
>>> The JobInterview entity should stay, but its model needs to be fixed.
>>> There should be a JobInterviewRole entity that connects the JobInterview
>>> with Party, then the jobIntervieweePartyId and jobInterviewerPartyId fields
>>> can be removed. We can also add a JobInterviewComm entity that connects
>>> JobInterview  to communication events.
>>>
>>> -Adrian
>>>
>>> On 7/27/2012 7:17 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>>>
>>>> Replacing them with the indicated entities......
>>>>
>>>> On 07/27/2012 12:27 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand the question. Are you proposing removing those
>>>>> entities?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/27/2012 4:42 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> we intend to reduce the number of entities in HR:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EmplLeave
>>>>>> EmplLeaveReasonType
>>>>>> EmplLeaveType  -> workeffort+related-entities so it also appears on
>>>>>> the calendar
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JobInterview
>>>>>> JobInterviewType -> communication event and related entities
>>>>>>
>>>>>> any comments or suggestions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to