I agree with Hans. 2012/7/27 Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
> I don't agree that a job interview is just another communication event. > > -Adrian > > > On 7/27/2012 7:59 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> Adrian, >> >> Just telling me it should stay, is not enough, you have to provide >> reasoning for that. >> >> my opinion is that a job interview is just a communication event of the >> new type 'Jobinterview' with the roles already there. A job interview can >> then already relate to other communication events of type email or >> others..... >> >> Hans >> >> On 07/27/2012 01:46 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> >>> I agree that employee leave belongs in the Work Effort entities. >>> >>> The JobInterview entity should stay, but its model needs to be fixed. >>> There should be a JobInterviewRole entity that connects the JobInterview >>> with Party, then the jobIntervieweePartyId and jobInterviewerPartyId fields >>> can be removed. We can also add a JobInterviewComm entity that connects >>> JobInterview to communication events. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> On 7/27/2012 7:17 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>> >>>> Replacing them with the indicated entities...... >>>> >>>> On 07/27/2012 12:27 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't understand the question. Are you proposing removing those >>>>> entities? >>>>> >>>>> -Adrian >>>>> >>>>> On 7/27/2012 4:42 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> we intend to reduce the number of entities in HR: >>>>>> >>>>>> EmplLeave >>>>>> EmplLeaveReasonType >>>>>> EmplLeaveType -> workeffort+related-entities so it also appears on >>>>>> the calendar >>>>>> >>>>>> JobInterview >>>>>> JobInterviewType -> communication event and related entities >>>>>> >>>>>> any comments or suggestions? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Hans >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
