On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote: > think Adam's point was that someone could synthesize a vote from you (or, > more importantly a vote from a mostly dormant member like Adam) and get > something to pass. Since, in practice, this kind of thing doesn't ever seem > to happen its probably not worth worrying about but his point is still > cogent.
Ok, thanks for the explanation Ean. Jacopo
