Jacques,
Thanks for clarification.

I have put my comments on Jira. My email on this email thread is my response to 
Paul’s big email about Hotwax Media.

Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
COO
Hotwax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/
ApacheCon US 2013 Gold Sponsor
http://na.apachecon.com/sponsors/

On Mar 18, 2014, at 5:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Anil,
> 
> Simply that we should put/keep comments in Jira issues when they are related. 
> This for history sake, I think I wrote that maybe a dozen times already.
> 
> Jacques
> 
> Le 18/03/2014 19:38, Anil Patel a écrit :
>> Jacques,
>> What do you mean when you say you agree with Pierre?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Anil Patel
>> COO
>> Hotwax Media Inc
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/
>> ApacheCon US 2013 Gold Sponsor
>> http://na.apachecon.com/sponsors/
>> 
>> On Mar 18, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I agree with you Pierre, but please consider to add at least a sentence on 
>>> what you are replying to.
>>> 
>>> The reason is some persons use Nabble instead of directly the ML. And 
>>> sometimes it takes few minutes for Nabble to sync with the ML, so it might 
>>> be confusing.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Jacques
>>> 
>>> Le 18/03/2014 14:04, Pierre Smits a écrit :
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>> It would be better to discuss the necessity and/or merits of each (JIRA)
>>>> issue in the issue itself, in stead of making generalizing assertions. It
>>>> would keep focus and would show that collaboration takes place to resolve
>>>> issues in this project.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Pierre Smits
>>>> 
>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
>>>> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional
>>>> Services and Retail & Trade
>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to