That's fine as far as I'm concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild if
that's not a problem.) Thanks, Daniel Dekany
Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> írta:
>I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk
>in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT?
>
>Jacopo
>
>On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test
>> case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test
>> coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null
>> issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on
>> the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward
>> compatible (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less
>> prone to fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need
>> to addjust some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany
>> Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> írta:
>>> Good news, thanks Jacopo!
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>> FYI:
>>>>
>>>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have
>>>> now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I
>>>> will update the OFBiz code accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato
>>>> <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful.
>>>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to
>>>>> say.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacopo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux
>>>>> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need to address this
>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>
