I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT?
Jacopo On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test > case, however. Alhough the reworked method overloading support has good test > coverage, this was a quite complex change (it doesn't just fix the null > issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to mention that turing on > the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward compatible > (that's why it's by default off). Although its much less prone to > fail with errors, there's still a little chance that you need to addjust > some OfBiz code. Thanks, Daniel Dekany > Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> írta: >> Good news, thanks Jacopo! >> >> Jacques >> >> Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>> FYI: >>> >>> I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have >>> now a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I >>> will update the OFBiz code accordingly. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful. >>>> I have posted a comment to the ticket: let's see what Daniel has to >>>> say. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We need to address this >>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2 >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;) >>> >>> >> >> --
