Interesting observations in that openhub evaluation. Something to think about!
Didn't know it existed. How OFBiz is perceived by others should be part of the considerations regarding future roadmaps and (short term) plans. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux < [email protected]> wrote: > The point with embedded documentation (in OOTB files) is, as long as it's > not in often changed files (where you have to be sure the documentation is > well maintained), you have it up to date at hand, without having to search > online which might be not always available (like Git is now often preferred > over svn for this reason) > > And morevoer I don't see why we would not update embedded documentation, > it's as important as code, it's actually part of it. This reflects for > instance in project evaluation like does https://www.openhub.net/p/ > Apache-OFBiz/factoids#FactoidCommentsLow > > But who cares anyway? :/ It seems nobody got the importance and value of > error.log in the dev community, I really wonder about that! > > Jacques > > Le 12/09/2014 09:03, Pierre Smits a écrit : > >> That, or otherwise improve the OFBiz documentation regarding logging. >> Referring to documentation on other sites is not enough. >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> Based Manufacturing, Professional >> Services and Retail & Trade >> http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Since Jacopo did not answer, here is my proposition. We could, as >>> suggested Nicolas, add some educational comments in log4j2.xml and add 2 >>> commented out sections for error.log >>> >>> Agreed? >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> Le 09/09/2014 15:10, Pierre Smits a écrit : >>> >>> And for whom >>> >>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>> >>>> Op 9 sep. 2014 om 14:23 heeft Jacques Le Roux < >>>> >>>>> [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le 09/09/2014 13:26, Nicolas Malin a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Le 09/09/2014 12:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> This is the main reason the trunk should be kept as clean as >>>>>>> possible, >>>>>>> instead of changing stuff to fit committers' personal preferences. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's clear and good to simplify the configuration on production >>>>>> site. >>>>>> >>>>>> On some other projet (mostly on debian ;) ), configuration file >>>>>> contains few enable element but so mostly commented configurations >>>>>> with >>>>>> context explication of the reason to use it. >>>>>> With a good text editor (notepad no match) it's also clear and simple >>>>>> and help uncover some other view. >>>>>> >>>>>> No I don't use trunk for my configuration, I have my own parameters >>>>>> with my own method to deploy them :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Nicolas >>>>>> >>>>>> That's a very interesting point Nicolas. The problem is now to know >>>>>> >>>>> what means "as clean as possible" in Jacopo's sentence above >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>
