On Sep 12, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote:
> That, or otherwise improve the OFBiz documentation regarding logging. Yes, I like this option! Jacopo > Referring to documentation on other sites is not enough. > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Since Jacopo did not answer, here is my proposition. We could, as >> suggested Nicolas, add some educational comments in log4j2.xml and add 2 >> commented out sections for error.log >> >> Agreed? >> >> Jacques >> >> Le 09/09/2014 15:10, Pierre Smits a écrit : >> >> And for whom >>> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>> >>> Op 9 sep. 2014 om 14:23 heeft Jacques Le Roux < >>>> [email protected]> het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 09/09/2014 13:26, Nicolas Malin a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Le 09/09/2014 12:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> This is the main reason the trunk should be kept as clean as possible, >>>>>> instead of changing stuff to fit committers' personal preferences. >>>>>> >>>>> It's clear and good to simplify the configuration on production site. >>>>> >>>>> On some other projet (mostly on debian ;) ), configuration file >>>>> contains few enable element but so mostly commented configurations with >>>>> context explication of the reason to use it. >>>>> With a good text editor (notepad no match) it's also clear and simple >>>>> and help uncover some other view. >>>>> >>>>> No I don't use trunk for my configuration, I have my own parameters >>>>> with my own method to deploy them :) >>>>> >>>>> Nicolas >>>>> >>>>> That's a very interesting point Nicolas. The problem is now to know >>>> what means "as clean as possible" in Jacopo's sentence above >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>> >>>
