On what basis? Regards Scott
On 12/09/2014, at 9:44 pm, Pierre Smits <[email protected]> wrote: > I support reverting this regression. > > Pierre Smits > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* > Services & Solutions for Cloud- > Based Manufacturing, Professional > Services and Retail & Trade > http://www.orrtiz.com > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sep 12, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don't understand why you are so not open to put back the error.log in >> log4j2.xml >> >> Because it is just one of 1 million possible ways to configure logging: it >> is a specific one on not a generic one and so it is not better than the >> other 1 million possibilities; you have explained why you like it but me or >> others could find similar arguments for the other millions ways; since no >> one seconded you in your attempt to add the configuration back this >> confirms to me that this specific configuration is not better than other; >> for this reason it should be left out of the trunk. >> >>> and qualify this as a mess and almost myself and idiot. >> >> I didn't say this and the mail archive can demonstrate it; you have been >> trying to raise the tone of the conversation since the beginning of this >> thread (and you did the same in at least another thread recently) but I >> will not start to fight with you. >> >> Jacopo >> >>
