+1 thank you Sharan.
Jacopo On Apr 1, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Sharan Foga <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All > > My suggestion would be: > > "Despite our best efforts to maintain up to three active release branches, > support for older branches can decrease because our project volunteers may be > focussed on other issues. We strongly recommend using releases from the most > recent branch wherever possible" > > > I think the phrase "because volunteers tend to focus their efforts on issues > that hold their interest more" could be seen as a bit negative (i.e meaning > we are not interested enough to fix your problem) which isn't the message we > want to send. > > Also the word "strongly" is optional so you can remove it if you think it's a > bit too strong - (no pun intended!). > > Thanks > Sharan > > > On 1.4.2015 14:30, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Le 01/04/2015 14:15, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : >>>> So you suggest we say anything? >>> I meant nothing >> Yeah. >> Or, if you really want to add something, I would rather use a text similar >> to what Adrian and Pierre suggested: >> >> "Despite the effort of the community to maintain up to three active release >> branches, the support for older release branches can decrease - because >> volunteers tend to focus their efforts on issues that hold their interest >> more. Whenever possible, we recommend to use the releases from the most >> recent branch." >> >> However even the above paragraph should be reviewed by a committer (e.g. >> Sharan, Adrian, Scott) that speaks English as the first language. >> >> Jacopo >> >
