Le 20/04/2015 09:47, Adrian Crum a écrit :
Generally speaking, I am in favor of using another framework. I have two
reservations about Moqui:
1. It is controlled by a single person - so responsiveness to issues are
dependent on that person's availability.
This is indeed a regression from the current community sharing. On the other hand a such change would not be done in one day, so we would have a long
period to experiment in parallel before possibly switching to Moqui.
I also guess in such cases David could open the Moqui to people he trusts. I though wonder how this would be linked together. Nothing blocking but to
be seriously thought about, not only technically but legally. I know it's David's will to share and he proved it already with OFBiz but the licensing
aspect is not clear to me http://www.moqui.org/#model.
2. It repeats a lot of mistakes that have been made in OFBiz, so those things
will need to be fixed again in Moqui after we bring it on board.
Indeed, a lot of fixes have been done recently in OFBiz which is battle tested for years. Moqui though certainly well done, is still young and we
would need to compare them, point by point.
Neither one is a show-stopper for me.
Same here, just cautious.
Jacques
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 4/20/2015 6:31 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Again, as discussed at the ApacheCon in Austin we should start setting
up a plan how to best move the ERP application to the Moqui framework.
Moqui should not be part of the Apache foundation however the ERP
application should remain there.
Not only will it improve development of the ERP system but also will
establish a clean separation between application and frameworks and
hopefully getting David Jones back into the project.
Yes, I realize i open the pandora box :-) but we need to make some major
decisions....
Regards,
Hans Bakker
antwebsystems.com
