On Apr 26, 2015, at 3:09 PM, Adrian Crum <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> How about "Replace framework core functionality - like entity engine, service 
> engine, and security with Moqui."
> 
> Is that specific enough?
> 

Not really: we have talked about bringing the whole Moqui codebase into the 
OFBiz trunk (bad idea in my opinion), or migrating the applications to Moqui, 
or reimplementing them and the sentence above doesn't specify a direction.
And why entity engine, service and security and not for example transaction 
management, connection pooling, ui technology, logging etc...?

Jacopo

> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
> 
> On 4/26/2015 1:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> The discussion is interesting and fascinating but in this thread completely 
>> different ideas have been expressed: from forking Moqui into OFBiz to 
>> rewriting OFBiz applications from scratch on top of Moqui etc...
>> 
>> My vote will be negative if the vote will be as generic as "replace OFBiz 
>> framework with Moqui" is because it would not be an actionable item and 
>> there could be 1000 totally different ways to implement it.
>> 
>> Jacopo
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 26, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Adrian Crum 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> This has been discussed for nearly a week now. Shall we start a vote?
>>> 
>>> Adrian Crum
>>> Sandglass Software
>>> www.sandglass-software.com
>>> 
>>> On 4/20/2015 6:31 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>>>> Again, as discussed at the ApacheCon in Austin we should start setting
>>>> up a plan how to best move the ERP application to the Moqui framework.
>>>> Moqui should not be part of the Apache foundation however the ERP
>>>> application should remain there.
>>>> 
>>>> Not only will it improve development of the ERP system but also will
>>>> establish a clean separation between application and frameworks and
>>>> hopefully getting David Jones back into the project.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, I realize i open the pandora box :-) but we need to make some major
>>>> decisions....
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hans Bakker
>>>> antwebsystems.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to