Actually I asked first whether there was consensus. And that was confirmed.
Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux < [email protected]> wrote: > Actually Pierre just followed http://www.apache.org/legal/sr > c-headers.html#faq-exceptions > > <<Other files may make sense to have no license header. Three examples are: > > * Short informational text files; for example README, INSTALL files. The > expectation is that these files make it obvious which product they relate > to.>> > > That seems OK with me > > Jacques > > > > Le 01/09/2016 à 08:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ... >>> Legal statements are not required in readme files, as per consensus in >>> dev >>> mail thread with title 'Shorter ASL2 header in short files'. The mail >>> thread started here: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/pc5bzrsiupef7xjt >>> >>> >>> Consensus? I was actually the only one to reply to your proposal and I >> wrote: >> >> "In my opinion we should include the full header, that is important >> to comply with the ASF licenses policies, unless there is a strong reason >> for not doing so. >> [...] >> By the way, my preference is, inline with what is mentioned in that >> document, to "err on having a source header and contact legal-discuss@ if >> unsure." >> >> Jacopo >> >> >
