Le 01/09/2016 à 11:33, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
So we don't apply a lazy consensus here and we need a vote? Why not follow
the advice in this page?
My suggestion is to go in one of the following two directions:
1) apply the standard license header to all the README files
2) or start a vote with a clear summary with your proposal for a different
license header (the vote should specify the exact header proposed, to which
files will be applied and why)
Wait, I don't want a different license header in readme files (w/ or w/o
suffixes)
I just want things to be consistent. Which resumes to no header at all in those
files, as I committed and as is recommended by the ASF
Do we really need a vote for that?
Jacques
Jacopo
Note that I have no strong opinion on putting the ASL2 header or not, I
want things to be consistent
Jacques
Le 01/09/2016 à 10:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
I still don't see where the consensus was reached: discussions in Jira are
not the same as discussion on the dev list (which is mentioned by Jacques
in "as per consensus in dev mail thread"). Also the conversation between
Jacques and Pierre in Jira is resolved with an unclear resolution to me.
In my opinion it is safer to include the license header in all the files,
including README files and the cost of adding it is negligible.
Jacopo
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Pierre Smits <[email protected]>
wrote:
Actually I asked first whether there was consensus. And that was
confirmed.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
[email protected]> wrote:
Actually Pierre just followed http://www.apache.org/legal/sr
c-headers.html#faq-exceptions
<<Other files may make sense to have no license header. Three examples
are:
* Short informational text files; for example README, INSTALL files.
The
expectation is that these files make it obvious which product they
relate
to.>>
That seems OK with me
Jacques
Le 01/09/2016 à 08:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:53 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
...
Legal statements are not required in readme files, as per consensus in
dev
mail thread with title 'Shorter ASL2 header in short files'. The mail
thread started here: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/
message/pc5bzrsiupef7xjt
Consensus? I was actually the only one to reply to your proposal and I
wrote:
"In my opinion we should include the full header, that is important
to comply with the ASF licenses policies, unless there is a strong
reason
for not doing so.
[...]
By the way, my preference is, inline with what is mentioned in that
document, to "err on having a source header and contact legal-discuss@
if
unsure."
Jacopo
