I won't ask such a thing of any contributor. Maybe you (or others) feel the
need to dictate how and when other volunteers spend their energy on the
itches they want/need to scratch.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Scott Gray <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Is it a complicated thing to ask our most prolific contributor to slow down
> so that we can all be effectively involved? Personally I don't think it is
> complicated.
>
> On 25/09/2016 22:03, "Pierre Smits" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Everyone participating can be blamed for complaints, or needlessly
> > prolonging discussions. Some want to discuss everything, Some blame the
> > other contributor.
> >
> > Does the blame game help the project? Instead of pointing out the 'flaw'
> in
> > other, it is better to apply some introspection first wit respect to one
> > own contributions and that helps the project forward.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> > OFBiz based solutions & services
> >
> > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Taher Alkhateeb <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I find it exhausting that I cannot focus on coding in OFBiz because of
> > the
> > > "machine-gun" like activities, many of which are triggered by Jacques.
> I
> > am
> > > spending more and more time trying to limit code getting into the
> > framework
> > > than actually doing critical things like refactoring and improving the
> > code
> > > base.
> > >
> > > Quality wins over quantity hands-down. We need to focus on quality, we
> > need
> > > to focus our limited resources and efforts on fewer but more critical
> > > issues. It is really tiring to engage in these threads that go on
> > > indefinitely many of which I find not that important anyway. For
> example:
> > >
> > > - There were some long, long discussions on whether or not to add
> Gradle
> > > shortcut tasks. These tasks are minor and not that important in the
> first
> > > place. Why bloat the code early, this can always be visited once we
> > finish
> > > more critical work.
> > > - We had discussions on "Style guides" when we have some very bad code
> > that
> > > needs to be cleaned first. Does it really matter if I say if(x==y) or
> if
> > > (x==y) when the bigger issues are unresolved like hidden mutable shared
> > > state, no interfaces, poor design, poor documentation, faulty logic,
> and
> > > spaghetti code. Before focusing on style and spending a lot of energy
> > > there, let's look at the much much bigger problem of poor quality and
> > badly
> > > designed code. (REF http://markmail.org/message/cpqfhxn6fnu5zuu7)
> > > - There was another long discussion for example on semi colons in
> Groovy
> > > scripts. Again, is that the most important thing right now? I can see
> > much
> > > bigger problems in our groovy scripts than that. (REF
> > > http://markmail.org/message/rabzquyotw3gf3vx)
> > > - We had a long discussion on whether to make binary releases when we
> > > didn't even release! (REF http://markmail.org/message/7up63poazemvgha2
> )
> > > - The themes discussion is not that important, it is more important to
> > > focus on the underlying technology. We have major problems in the way
> > > themes are designed, web assets are fragmented between framework, apps
> > and
> > > themes, there is a lot of duplication, the widget system is not pure
> and
> > > mixed with a lot of templates. These problems are more pressing and if
> > > resolved, makes the themes a smaller problem. (REF
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8293
> > >
> > > So I think the philosophy (Less is More) is very relevant in here. We
> > need
> > > less long exhausting threads and more focus on critical technical areas
> > to
> > > help improve the fundamentals of our project.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Paul Piper <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Aren't these meant to be private discussions between you guys
> (perhaps
> > > > within
> > > > the PMC ml)?
> > > >
> > > > I don't understand how Jacques' activity level has anything to do
> with
> > > the
> > > > topic discussed here, or on this thread
> > > > (http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Wiki-page-for-the-
> > > > monthly-Jira-issues-list-creation-in-the-blog-
> tp4694738p4695235.html).
> > > >
> > > > Oh and -1 on flatgrey as it is one of the few themes that aren't
> broken
> > > > within stock ofbiz.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.
> > > > com/VOTE-Put-the-Flatgrey-theme-in-Attic-tp4695129p4695240.html
> > > > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to