If people see a possible issue or are in doubt with a proposition, I propose
they quickly put a -1 as they would put a +1 on the contrary.
It would not a be vote, but then we would know that there is a kind of
disagreement, but not yet time to explain it clearly.
And we would know we need to wait a bit more than normally and especially ask
the persons who are concerned why they are.
Then we would wait their answers in a reasonable delay. By convention this
would be 3 days.
I propose this rule to be written in a set of OFBiz specific rules which AFAIK
are still to be written.
So this would be the first and we would create a prominent wiki page for that.
I think that by written OFBiz specific rules in a wiki page it will clarify the situations in most cases. We would of course add new OFBiz specific
rules when a new case would be crossed.
What do you think? Of course, here again lazy consensus apply https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus but you might already use
the proposition above...
Jacques
Le 24/09/2016 à 23:39, Scott Gray a écrit :
- I think you rely on lazy consensus too much. Not many contributors have
as much time as you to give to the project and formulating an argument
against something (and then continuing the discussion) can take up a lot of
time and energy. In my experience people are generally very quick to agree
to good ideas (because it takes no effort other than to reply +1) so if you
get*no* responses then you should IMO take pause before pushing ahead.
Regards
Scott
