Thank you so much Deepak for the detailed explanation.
Thanks James for sharing your thoughts.


Regards,
Renuka Srishti

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Deepak Dixit <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> System create new inventory item each time, it does not use single
> InventoryItem for all backorder. So it create incorrect inventory item(s)
> data for serialized inventory item.
> I think we can refine serialized inventory item support under
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7762
>
> As per current implementation serialized inventory logic implemented on
> status, and non-serialized inventory logic implemented on
> InventoryItemDetail.
>
> Ideally both should use IID and if item is serialized than qoh can't be
> greater then one, if we go with this route than we can implement status
> base check on both type of inventory item.
> Like if inventory item is defective than we can set its ATP to zero for
> both cases etc....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> --
> Deepak Dixit
> www.hotwaxsystems.com
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:42 PM, james yong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Renuka,
> >
> > In this case, the non-serialized inventory acts as a placeholder to
> ensure
> > the final ATP is correct.
> > This is correct behaviour, and not a bug.
> >
> > Regards,
> > James
> >
> >
> > Renuka Srishti-2 wrote
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > In OFBiz, when we create an order for product with serialized inventory
> > > with quantity more than ATP then a negative ATP Inventory Item record
> is
> > > created, which is of type Non-Serialized.
> > > It should be of type serialized .
> > >
> > > If we resolve this issue, we need to check all scenarios related to
> this
> > > process. Please let me know your thoughts. If it looks good I will
> open a
> > > ticket for the same.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Renuka Srishti
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.
> > com/Serialized-Inventory-issue-with-backorder-item-
> tp4700367p4700409.html
> > Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Reply via email to