Hi,

On 15.07.2014, at 10:58, Amend, Christian <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This mail thread will be used to discuss about the name of the java script 
> library, which version number to use for the first release and how the 
> distribution should look like.
> 
> First the name, there have been the following ideas:
> 1. Keep it as DataJs like before. 
> 2. Use a name like OlingoJs
> What do you think about this? Any other name ideas?

I suggest "Olingo.JS".

> 
> Second the version number. You can freely choose a number. There are no 
> Apache guidelines which would force you to do anything. I would recommend to 
> either name it 4.0 to be compliant with the OData version or something like 
> 4.0-beta if there are still a lot of issues you would like to tackle after 
> the release. 
> WDYT?

I would use "4.0.0" if the java script code is already in a stable state.
Otherwise if their is still "a lot of flow" I would prefer "0.1.0" and then 
switch to "4.0.0" with the first stable release.

Kind regards,
Michael

> 
> The distribution is what will be available on our Olingo.org website. You can 
> have a look at the Java distribution for V2 here: 
> http://olingo.apache.org/download.html
> For Java Script we need a source release as this is mandatory by Apache. I 
> would also recommend a minified version which can be directly used. 
> But here again WDYT?
> 
> Best Regards,
> Christian

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to