+1

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Klevenz, Stephan <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Olingo.JS would be another naming proposal.
>
> About version number scheme:
>
> I fear a little bit that we confuse users with OData protocol versions and
> Olingo implementations having their own version history. What do you think
> about this:
>
> Olingo Java 2.x.x is OData 2.0
> Olingo Java 4.x.x is OData 4.0
> Olingo JS   4.x.x is OData 4.0
>
> So, for Java and JS start consequently with 4.0.0 follow the
> recommendation of [1] for semantic of the 3 digits.
>
> Furthermore there is another option to point out that we are doing a 1st
> release which is in a kind of beta state. For Java we can do something
> like this:
>
> 4.0.0.beta1 (or any other label)
>
> If we are happy with the 1st release and get only happy feedback ;) then
> we can remove the beta label. If not we can do another one.
>
> WDYT?
>
> -- Stephan
>
>
>
> [1] http://semver.org/
>
>
>
> On 16.07.14 14:44, "Kobler-Morris, Sven" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >regarding naming ( here is a list from the posts):
> >
> >1. ODataJS
> >2. OData.JS
> >3. OlingoJS
> >
> >but let's first collect all names and then start a vote. Think I start
> >the Vote on Friday so please send any suggestions tomorrow or Friday so
> >that I can collect them.
> >
> >regarding the start version:
> >
> >1.   Start-Version 2.0.0     --> It should be 2.0.0 since the new library
> >covers only OData V4, so we have here a clear separation to the datajs
> >lib 1.x which covers OData V1-V3
> >
> >Regards,
> >Sven
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Amend, Christian [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2014 10:59
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: [DISCUSS] Java Script library Name, Version Number, Distribution
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >This mail thread will be used to discuss about the name of the java
> >script library, which version number to use for the first release and how
> >the distribution should look like.
> >
> >First the name, there have been the following ideas:
> >1. Keep it as DataJs like before.
> >2. Use a name like OlingoJs
> >What do you think about this? Any other name ideas?
> >
> >Second the version number. You can freely choose a number. There are no
> >Apache guidelines which would force you to do anything. I would recommend
> >to either name it 4.0 to be compliant with the OData version or something
> >like 4.0-beta if there are still a lot of issues you would like to tackle
> >after the release.
> >WDYT?
> >
> >The distribution is what will be available on our Olingo.org website. You
> >can have a look at the Java distribution for V2 here:
> >http://olingo.apache.org/download.html
> >For Java Script we need a source release as this is mandatory by Apache.
> >I would also recommend a minified version which can be directly used.
> >But here again WDYT?
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Christian
>
>


-- 
Carl J. Mosca

Reply via email to