I am OK without adding "Library" to the names. Carl
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Yi Ding <yid...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thank you for organizing this. One proposal is to not having "-Library" in > the artifact names. Thus, they will be "Olingo OData Client for Java > 4.0.0-beta-01" and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01". Some > thoughts with this proposal: > 1. It has name consistency with the Olingo JavaScript client > 2. Some existing OData libraries don't have "library" in their names (e.g. > OData Client for .NET: > https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.OData.Client/) > > Best, > Yi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.b...@sap.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:09 PM > To: dev@olingo.apache.org > Subject: Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”? > > Hi Challen, > > thanks for offer of support. > > I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the > release preparations. > Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo > OData Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData > Server-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”. > So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use. > On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o) > > @All: Some opinions about this? > > Kind regards, > Michael > > > On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <chall...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > +1 for java client naming & release. > > I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed. > > > > > > Thanks,-Challen > > > > From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.b...@sap.com] > > Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18 > > To: dev@olingo.apache.org > > Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”? > > > > Hi All, > > > > with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script > 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release. > > > > A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 > open issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues > just related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see: > http://s.apache.org/olingo-4). > > So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) > and either fix/close or postpone them to the next release. > > Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till > the release is done. > > Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the > last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java > 4.0.0-beta-01”. > > WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? > IMHO we should do both ;o) > > > > Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release > preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week. > > > > Again, WDYT about creation of a release? > > > > Kind regards, > > Michael > > -- Carl J. Mosca
