Hi together, based on the feedback and discussion I have changed the "olingo" part in the artifact ids to "odata" and renamed the distributions to: - "Olingo OData Client for Android 4.0.0-beta-01” - "Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” - "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”
All those preparations are currently in the "OLINGO-342_Release_OData_4.0.0-beta-01" branch [1]. If there are no objections against I will use this as base for the "4.0.0-beta-01-RC01". Hence, please do not commit code modification into current master. Which I would then create tomorrow and trigger the vote for a release of version "4.0.0-beta-01". Kind regards, Michael [1]: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=olingo-odata4.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/OLINGO-342_Release_OData_4.0.0-beta-01 On 10.09.2014, at 05:36, Bolz, Michael <michael.b...@sap.com> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks a lot for feedback. > > I agree with the names without the library part. So as example we then get: > "Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server for > Java 4.0.0-beta-01”. > > Based on this I will start with the preparation for the RC01 which then > results in: > "Olingo OData Client for Java 4.0.0-beta-01-RC01” and "Olingo OData Server > for Java 4.0.0-beta-01-RC01”. > > I think till the end of the week the RC01 could be available (on the homepage > and in the maven repo) for a release vote. > > Kind regards, > Michael > > > On 09.09.2014, at 18:22, Ramesh Reddy <rare...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 for not having "Library" in the name, that seems verbose otherwise. Also, >> are you guys planning on having them in maven repo? >> +1 for separate client and server distributions, as I suspect there is going >> to be lot of client users compare to server api consumers. >> >> Ramesh.. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Thank you for organizing this. One proposal is to not having "-Library" in >>> the artifact names. Thus, they will be "Olingo OData Client for Java >>> 4.0.0-beta-01" and "Olingo OData Server for Java 4.0.0-beta-01". Some >>> thoughts with this proposal: >>> 1. It has name consistency with the Olingo JavaScript client >>> 2. Some existing OData libraries don't have "library" in their names (e.g. >>> OData Client for .NET: >>> https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.OData.Client/) >>> >>> Best, >>> Yi >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.b...@sap.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 2:09 PM >>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”? >>> >>> Hi Challen, >>> >>> thanks for offer of support. >>> >>> I will wait till tomorrow for other opinions and then start with the release >>> preparations. >>> Another thought during the weekend was to split the naming into "Olingo >>> OData >>> Client-Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01” and "Olingo OData Server-Library for >>> Java 4.0.0-beta-01”. >>> So it is probably more clear which distribution someone want to use. >>> On the other side it is a very long name for an artifact ;o) >>> >>> @All: Some opinions about this? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> On 09.09.2014, at 05:55, Challen He <chall...@microsoft.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for java client naming & release. >>>> I will be happy to work with you on the logistics as needed. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks,-Challen >>>> >>>> From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:michael.b...@sap.com] >>>> Sent: 2014年9月5日 21:18 >>>> To: dev@olingo.apache.org >>>> Subject: Prepare Release "Olingo OData Library for Java 4.0.0-beta-01”? >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> with the coming release of the "Olingo OData Client for Java Script >>>> 4.0.0-beta-01” we should also prepare the according Java release. >>>> >>>> A JIRA Issue was already created by Stephan and currently there are 9 open >>>> issues related to version "4.0.0-beta-01”, but no bug and 5 issues just >>>> related to release preparations and 2 related to Javascript (see: >>>> http://s.apache.org/olingo-4). >>>> So we should check the remaining two issues (OLINGO-347 and OLINGO-213) and >>>> either fix/close or postpone them to the next release. >>>> Additionally we should think about a "code freeze" on the master till the >>>> release is done. >>>> Further we should think about renaming the Java library according to the >>>> last discussion in Javascript context to "Olingo OData Library for Java >>>> 4.0.0-beta-01”. >>>> WDYT, should we do a) a rename and b) already with the next release? IMHO >>>> we should do both ;o) >>>> >>>> Nevertheless I hope we can start till mid of next week with the release >>>> preparation to get a RC01 at the end of next week. >>>> >>>> Again, WDYT about creation of a release? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Michael >>> >>> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
