Claudio, It is NO annotation processor, "server-core-ext" framework takes care of much of the boilerplate code, and an example of that can be found here https://github.com/apache/olingo-odata4/blob/master/lib/server-core-ext/src/test/java/org/apache/olingo/server/example/TripPinServiceTest.java
Original thought was to add-on annotation processor but that never got materialized. Ramesh.. ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Claudio, > > there is currently no Annotation Processor for V4. An approach that does not > require this much boilerplate code is the Olingo OData Server Extension for > Java. You can find the JARs on the download page: > http://olingo.apache.org/doc/odata4/download.html > Unfortunately I am not aware of documentation regarding this extension. > > If you would like to contribute an Annotation approach please have a look at > our contribution guide: http://olingo.apache.org/contribute.html > > Thanks & Best Regards, > Christian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Claudio Mauri [mailto:claudio.ma...@limontainformatica.it] > Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 09:48 > To: dev@olingo.apache.org > Subject: Olingo V4 Java Annotation Processor ? > > First of all, sorry if I'm writing to the wrong mailing list, but I presume > that my question may be answered only by developers of the framework.. > > When I started studying Olingo V4 (I've entirely skipped V2 version) I've > got the feeling that the library itself is very powerful, but requires > really a lot of boilerplate code to work with. > > So, I started to adapt the Tutorial provided on Apache Olingo web site (for > version 4) to create an equivalent of the DemoEntityProcessor that would be > able to work with annotated POJO and to call internally an implementation of > a custom "service" to perform crud operations.... Only to realize after that > is exactly what Olingo V2 Java Annotation processor does ! > Unluckily, I found no documentation about something similar for Olingo V4. > So, is there something similar already available - or, at least, planned - > for V4 too ? Of course I would by far prefer to use an "official" > implementation of an annotation processor instead of trying to write it > myself (with few chances to succeed...) > > Thanks for your time and sorry if I bothered you. > > All the bests, > > Claudio > > > > > > > > >
