I have attached another zip with refactored code: + org.apache.olingo + Apache license header to all files
- Stephan On 24.07.13 09:41, "V.A, Chandan" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Stephan, >It's fine with me. > >Kind Regards >Chandan VA > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Klevenz, Stephan [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 1:02 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: initial code contribution > >Hi, > >I suggest to do as Florian has proposed. I will do another ZIP with >packaging org.apache.olingo + Apache header. All the rest can be community >work. > >WDYT? > >Stephan > >On 24.07.13 07:43, "V.A, Chandan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi all, >>We need to refactor not just the package name but also the artifact id in >>case of JPA processor library. >> >>@Stephan, >>You had initially proposed changes to artifact id in case of JPA >>processor library to align with OData Lib. Do we need to do that now in >>GITHUB first or do it after initial commit. >> >> >>Thanks, >>Kind Regards >>Chandan VA >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Bolz, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:39 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: initial code contribution >> >>Hi Florian, >> >>Wouldn't it be better to do it after the initial commit? >>So we have this part of history which could help to link to the (a little >>messy) history on GitHub. >> >>Or we do the changes on GitHub on then do the initial commit. I think >>this >>could be a good solution. >> >>By the way I have attached a small script for package renaming to the >>JIRA >>issue. >> >>Kind regards, >>Michael >> >> >> >>On 23.07.13 18:14, "Florian Müller" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>Hi Stephan, >>> >>>Before we check the code into the Apache Git, we should make a few >>>general changes to it. >>>We should have at least the Apache header in each source file. It would >>>also be good to change package names to something like >>>"org.apache.olingo...". >>> >>> >>>Florian >>> >>> >>>> >> >
