But there is also Configuration in the package. And while we are at it... there is method name configure.
so it would read like: o.a.onami.configuration.Configuration::configure Maybe we cannot avoid it, but its not so pretty On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah, agreed! :) > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Manzke > <[email protected]> wrote: >> For me Configuration or something else would be better due to the fact that >> there is Onami already in the package. >> >> Von meinem iPad gesendet >> >> Am 26.11.2012 um 17:31 schrieb Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> What we inherited from donated codebase is the following class >>> >>> org.nnsoft.guice.rocoto.Rocoto >>> >>> now under >>> >>> org.apache.onami.configuration.Rocoto >>> >>> Shall we rename to >>> >>> org.apache.onami.configuration.OnamiConfiguration >>> >>> ? TIA! >>> -Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> http://www.99soft.org/ -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
