That's true man ;)
2012/11/27 Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> > But there is also Configuration in the package. > And while we are at it... there is method name configure. > > so it would read like: > o.a.onami.configuration.Configuration::configure > > Maybe we cannot avoid it, but its not so pretty > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Simone Tripodi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > yeah, agreed! :) > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Manzke > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For me Configuration or something else would be better due to the fact > that there is Onami already in the package. > >> > >> Von meinem iPad gesendet > >> > >> Am 26.11.2012 um 17:31 schrieb Simone Tripodi <[email protected] > >: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> What we inherited from donated codebase is the following class > >>> > >>> org.nnsoft.guice.rocoto.Rocoto > >>> > >>> now under > >>> > >>> org.apache.onami.configuration.Rocoto > >>> > >>> Shall we rename to > >>> > >>> org.apache.onami.configuration.OnamiConfiguration > >>> > >>> ? TIA! > >>> -Simo > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >>> http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de > -- Viele Grüße/Best Regards Daniel Manzke
