+1!
-- Joyce On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ramirez, Paul M (398M) < [email protected]> wrote: > That would be awesome. > > --Paul > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 8, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Yep and longer term I am thinking of a more clever solution (aka plugin) > to > > update radix script version > > > >> On Sunday, February 8, 2015, Tom Barber <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I'm happy if Val is happy ;) > >> > >> +1 > >> > >>> On 08/02/15 22:17, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > >>> > >>> Well Tom my justification for my +1 was that there has been a bunch of > >>> other issues addressed. > >>> At end of the day it is down to release managers digression. > >>> I am happy to see 0.8.1 going out as is per release candidate. > >>> The script update instructions are documented within the release > procedure > >>> so we will catch them the next time around. > >>> My VOTE stands as +1 > >>> Thanks > >>> Lewis > >>> > >>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I've not looked, but don't you need to unpeg Radix so the fix that > 0.8.1 > >>>> was built for in the first place goes through? > >>>> > >>>> Tom > >>>> > >>>> On 08/02/15 21:44, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Chris, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The release was made from the OODT 0.8.1 tag (r1658019) at: > >>>>> > >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've checked both of the tags for the OODT version within the radix > >>>>>> > >>>>> archetype script > >>>>> > >>>>> Both RC's at [0] and [1] have OODT version pegged to 0.8 rather than > >>>>> 0.8.1 > >>>>> > >>>>> [0] > >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1-rc1/mvn/ > >>>>> archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1/mvn/ > >>>>> archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix > >>>>> > >>>>> MD5: matches > >>>>> SHA1: matches > >>>>> Signature: Chris Mattmann (CODE SIGNING KEY) <[email protected]> > >>>>> Python tests: pass > >>>>> Java tests: pass > >>>>> > >>>>> All good for me except for the radix script. > >>>>> What do people think? > >>>>> > >>>>> Personally, I am +1 as this is not a blocking issue. > >>>>> > >>>>> Lewis > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>> *Tom Barber* | Technical Director > >>>> > >>>> meteorite bi > >>>> *T:* +44 20 8133 3730 > >>>> *W:* www.meteorite.bi | *Skype:* meteorite.consulting > >>>> *A:* Surrey Technology Centre, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 > 7YG, > >>>> UK > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> *Tom Barber* | Technical Director > >> > >> meteorite bi > >> *T:* +44 20 8133 3730 > >> *W:* www.meteorite.bi | *Skype:* meteorite.consulting > >> *A:* Surrey Technology Centre, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 > 7YG, UK > >> >
