+1 Thanks Chris! That worked out much better.
Valerie A. Mallder New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 12:54 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.8.1 RC #2 > > Hi Val, > > Unfortunately you won’t be able to validate RADIX running in the fashion that > you > want since it’s not published on the Central repository yet (and won’t be > until this > VOTE is passed and I can release it). > > In the interim what you could do is: > > 1. Download Apache OODT 0.8.1 RC #2 > 2. unzip > 3. cd apache-oodt-0.8.1-src > 4. mvn install > (should generate a local copy in your m2 repo cache of the RADIX archetype). > (along with the rest of the OODT 0.8.1 RC, which it should pull from instead > of > central/remote) (then do this) 5. edit > mvn/archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix and change 0.8 to 0.8.1 6. run > mvn/archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix > (should pull from your local repo and the archetype there, which in turn > should pull > the correct [local] version(s) of the jars) > > Try that and let me know if it fixes it. If so, please VOTE +1 and we’ll get > this > going. > Otherwise tell me where it broke and I’ll try and fix. > > Cheers, > Chris > > ------------------------ > Chris Mattmann > [email protected] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Mallder, Valerie" <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, February 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.8.1 RC #2 > > >Unfortunately, Val is not happy yet :( I'm really having a problem > >downloading and building the radix archetype version of OODT 0.8.1. And > >I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. But, if what Lewis says is true, and > >no one really cares if the radix archetype in OODT 0.8.1 is > >downloadable and buildable, then I guess they should go ahead and release it. > > > >Here's what's happening: > > > >If you checkout the radix script form 0.8.1-rc1, and run it 'as is', > >(as Chris says, it does still run) then follow instructions for > >building, you do not get any of the 0.8.1 jar files downloaded or > >installed and therefore the following problems still exist when running > >with then radix archetype. > > > >OODT-785 is marked as 'resolved' in 0.8, but still exists in the radix > >version of 0.8.1.(batch_stub doesn't run in legacy mode) > >OODT-757 is marked as 'closed' in 0.8, but still exists in 0.8.1 > >because cas-pge-0.3.jar is still being installed in the pge/lib, > >workflow/lib, and resmgr/lib (I don't know if there is a JIRA issue for > >that). > >OODT-761 is marked as 'resolved' in 0.8.1, but resmgr/lib still > >contains cas-workflow-0.3.jar > >OODT-805 is marked as 'resolved' in 0.8.1, but still exists. > >And cas-filemgr-xx.jar is missing from workflow/lib and resmgr/lib (not > >sure if there is a JIRA issue for this one either). > > > >(My system requires all of these patches in order to run the JEDI > >instrument pipeline that I’m trying to build here at APL.) > > > >If, instead of running with the default radix script and leaving it 'as > >is', you modify it so that it references 0.8.1 instead of 0.8, then you > >get this build error: > > > >[INFO] Scanning for projects... > >[INFO] > > > >[INFO] > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- [INFO] Building Maven Stub Project (No POM) 1 [INFO] > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- > >[INFO] > >[INFO] >>> maven-archetype-plugin:2.2:generate (default-cli) @ > >standalone-pom >>> [INFO] [INFO] <<< > >maven-archetype-plugin:2.2:generate (default-cli) @ standalone-pom <<< > >[INFO] [INFO] --- maven-archetype-plugin:2.2:generate (default-cli) @ > >standalone-pom --- [INFO] Generating project in Interactive mode [INFO] > >Archetype repository missing. Using the one from > >[org.apache.oodt:radix-archetype:0.8] found in catalog remote [INFO] > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- > >[INFO] BUILD FAILURE > >[INFO] > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- > >[INFO] Total time: 2.377s > >[INFO] Finished at: Mon Feb 09 12:30:06 EST 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: > >29M/1448M [INFO] > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >- > >[ERROR] Failed to execute goal > >org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-archetype-plugin:2.2:generate > >(default-cli) on project standalone-pom: The desired archetype does not > >exist (org.apache.oodt:radix-archetype:0.8.1) -> [Help 1] [ERROR] > >[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with > >the -e switch. > >[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging. > >[ERROR] > >[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, > >please read the following articles: > >[ERROR] [Help 1] > >http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoFailureException > > > > > >Any help you guys can provide would be greatly appreciated! > > > >Thanks, > >Val > > > > > > > >Valerie A. Mallder > >New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer Johns Hopkins > >University/Applied Physics Laboratory > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Tom Barber [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 5:20 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 0.8.1 RC #2 > >> > >> I'm happy if Val is happy ;) > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On 08/02/15 22:17, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > >> > Well Tom my justification for my +1 was that there has been a bunch > >> > of other issues addressed. > >> > At end of the day it is down to release managers digression. > >> > I am happy to see 0.8.1 going out as is per release candidate. > >> > The script update instructions are documented within the release > >> > procedure so we will catch them the next time around. > >> > My VOTE stands as +1 > >> > Thanks > >> > Lewis > >> > > >> > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Tom Barber > >> > <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> I've not looked, but don't you need to unpeg Radix so the fix that > >> >> 0.8.1 was built for in the first place goes through? > >> >> > >> >> Tom > >> >> > >> >> On 08/02/15 21:44, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi Chris, > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < > >> >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> The release was made from the OODT 0.8.1 tag (r1658019) at: > >> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1/ > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I've checked both of the tags for the OODT version within the > >> >>>> radix > >> >>> archetype script > >> >>> > >> >>> Both RC's at [0] and [1] have OODT version pegged to 0.8 rather > >> >>> than > >> >>> 0.8.1 > >> >>> > >> >>> [0] > >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1-rc1/mvn/ > >> >>> archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix > >> >>> [1] > >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8.1/mvn/ > >> >>> archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/bin/radix > >> >>> > >> >>> MD5: matches > >> >>> SHA1: matches > >> >>> Signature: Chris Mattmann (CODE SIGNING KEY) > >> >>> <[email protected]> Python tests: pass Java tests: pass > >> >>> > >> >>> All good for me except for the radix script. > >> >>> What do people think? > >> >>> > >> >>> Personally, I am +1 as this is not a blocking issue. > >> >>> > >> >>> Lewis > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> -- > >> >> *Tom Barber* | Technical Director > >> >> > >> >> meteorite bi > >> >> *T:* +44 20 8133 3730 > >> >> *W:* www.meteorite.bi | *Skype:* meteorite.consulting > >> >> *A:* Surrey Technology Centre, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, > >> >> GU2 7YG, UK > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *Tom Barber* | Technical Director > >> > >> meteorite bi > >> *T:* +44 20 8133 3730 > >> *W:* www.meteorite.bi | *Skype:* meteorite.consulting > >> *A:* Surrey Technology Centre, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 > >>7YG, UK >
