Super! If you move to git as the main repository (when?), please don't forget to update the reviewboard configuration, too, to point to the git repo. This way, we might be able to actually RBTools to upload review updates directly from the git repository.
2015-08-24 18:05 GMT+03:00 Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>: > +1 > > > -- Jimmy > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> > wrote: > > > 1000 times yes. > > > > I asked Chris about this a few years ago and he told me svn was fine now > > he's a git slut..... I think that's the technical term. > > > > Anyway for those of us who live with rubbish broadband or who like > > committing often but out of the main repo it's a welcome change. > > > > Tom > > On 22 Aug 2015 1:55 am, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" < > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Valerie, > > > Main rationale seems to be that most patches are comingr through > Github. > > > Therefore people seem to be pulling code from the github mirror at > master > > > branch as oppose to from SVN trunk. > > > > > > On Friday, August 21, 2015, Mallder, Valerie < > valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I guess I can't really object. But, I don't really want to learn "yet > > > > another CM system" :(. Would be nice to know the rationale behind the > > > > change though. Why would this be considered an "improvement"? I > haven't > > > run > > > > into anything yet that would make me dislike svn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:50:01 PM > > > > To: dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;> > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to git) > > > > > > > > I would be fully supportive of this. > > > > > > > > What do others in the community think? If there are no objections > > > > over the next week I’d like to call a VOTE. > > > > > > > > Note, Radu, that this wouldn’t mean “moving to Github”. Github != > > > > Git != Apache. Apache has writeable Git repos (that run on ASF > > > > hardware) and separately, Git mirrors that mirror and interact with > > > > Github from the Apache gold source. Everyone should check out: > > > > http://git.apache.org for more detail. > > > > > > > > Thoughts, please? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > > Chief Architect > > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov <javascript:;> > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Radu Manole <manole.v.r...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>" <dev@oodt.apache.org > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM > > > > To: oodt <dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > Subject: Moving repository to git > > > > > > > > >Hello, > > > > > > > > > >Did you consider moving to git from svn as the main repository for > the > > > > >project? > > > > >Especially since most of the pull requests are done from github, > > > > >converting > > > > >a diff to svn feels a bit unnecessary. > > > > > > > > > >It woul have made my life easier certainly. Especially if I didn't > > have > > > to > > > > >convert from git to svn diffs in order to post reviews on review > > board. > > > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > > >Radu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Lewis* > > > > > >
