Hi Folks, Is anyone taking this on or can I log an issue with INFRA and address it? Thanks Lewis
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Radu Manole <manole.v.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Super! > > If you move to git as the main repository (when?), please don't forget to > update the reviewboard configuration, too, to point to the git repo. This > way, we might be able to actually RBTools to upload review updates directly > from the git repository. > > 2015-08-24 18:05 GMT+03:00 Michael Joyce <jo...@apache.org>: > > > +1 > > > > > > -- Jimmy > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> > > wrote: > > > > > 1000 times yes. > > > > > > I asked Chris about this a few years ago and he told me svn was fine > now > > > he's a git slut..... I think that's the technical term. > > > > > > Anyway for those of us who live with rubbish broadband or who like > > > committing often but out of the main repo it's a welcome change. > > > > > > Tom > > > On 22 Aug 2015 1:55 am, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" < > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Valerie, > > > > Main rationale seems to be that most patches are comingr through > > Github. > > > > Therefore people seem to be pulling code from the github mirror at > > master > > > > branch as oppose to from SVN trunk. > > > > > > > > On Friday, August 21, 2015, Mallder, Valerie < > > valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I guess I can't really object. But, I don't really want to learn > "yet > > > > > another CM system" :(. Would be nice to know the rationale behind > the > > > > > change though. Why would this be considered an "improvement"? I > > haven't > > > > run > > > > > into anything yet that would make me dislike svn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 3:50:01 PM > > > > > To: dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;> > > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to Git (was Re: Moving repository to git) > > > > > > > > > > I would be fully supportive of this. > > > > > > > > > > What do others in the community think? If there are no objections > > > > > over the next week I’d like to call a VOTE. > > > > > > > > > > Note, Radu, that this wouldn’t mean “moving to Github”. Github != > > > > > Git != Apache. Apache has writeable Git repos (that run on ASF > > > > > hardware) and separately, Git mirrors that mirror and interact with > > > > > Github from the Apache gold source. Everyone should check out: > > > > > http://git.apache.org for more detail. > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts, please? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > > > > Chief Architect > > > > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > > > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > > > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > > > > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov <javascript:;> > > > > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > > > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Radu Manole <manole.v.r...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > > > Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>" < > dev@oodt.apache.org > > > > > <javascript:;>> > > > > > Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 at 11:51 AM > > > > > To: oodt <dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > > > Subject: Moving repository to git > > > > > > > > > > >Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > >Did you consider moving to git from svn as the main repository for > > the > > > > > >project? > > > > > >Especially since most of the pull requests are done from github, > > > > > >converting > > > > > >a diff to svn feels a bit unnecessary. > > > > > > > > > > > >It woul have made my life easier certainly. Especially if I didn't > > > have > > > > to > > > > > >convert from git to svn diffs in order to post reviews on review > > > board. > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > > > >Radu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Lewis* > > > > > > > > > > -- *Lewis*
