+1

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:37 AM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Of interest – DRAT is a de facto standard use of Apache OODT (
>
> Proposal to bring it to Apache is mentioned below…
>
>
>
> On 8/2/17, 10:35 AM, "Chris Mattmann" <mattm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     Hi Board-Chat@,
>
>     CC/Incubator@
>
>     We are proposing to bring DRAT (Distributed Release Audit Tool) to the
> ASF.
>     DRAT is a parallelized version of Apache RAT that uses OODT, Solr and
> Tika to
>     compute, visualize and interact with interesting statistics on code
> auditing as
>     output by RAT and Tika. With DRAT you can:
>
>     • Audit large code repositories (has been tested in 100s of M of lines
> of
>     code, and 1000s of projects)  where RAT fails to complete – an example
> of running it across all of Apache
>     SVN is here: http://drat.dyndns.org:8080/dratviz/ You can also see
> its output
>     for a very large set of NSF funded geosciences code repositories here:
>     http://drat.dyndns.org:8080/dratontoviz/
>     • Visualize and interact with the output from RAT and Tika in a
> dynamic fashion
>     • Get incremental status from code auditing
>     • Audit individual code repos and integrate the results into your
> project
>
>     DRAT was funded by DARPA, NASA, the NSF and other government entities.
>
>     We have prepared a preliminary proposal here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DRATProposal
>
>     We are working on flushing it out more, should be done by this
> weekend. We propose
>     DRAT to be a straight to TLP (pTLP). I will add a resolution into the
> Board agenda for August 2017
>     for its consideration. I am CC’ing the Incubator so that we can
> potentially attract new contributors
>     both seasoned and junior to the project. We also welcome any
> contributors from Creadur interested
>     in learning more about OODT, Solr, Tika, etc. Also any Wicket gurus –
> we are using Wicket for one of
>     DRAT’s key user interfaces, Proteus.
>
>     OK, thanks!
>
>     Cheers,
>     Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to