Functionality, is certainly core to what we do. My thinking behind the React stuff is accessibility for people who want to develop OODT further or use it in existing projects. Standalone components should be easier to integrate than a full web app, and for people just wanting OPSUI functionality, this provides that but with (hopefully) a lower barrier to entry for existing web developers who might be looking for something interesting to get their teeth into.
Whether that is the case or not, time will tell, but I do have a willing band of volunteers wanting to help, so we’ll see where we get to. On 18 October 2018 at 19:56:56, lewis john mcgibbney (lewi...@apache.org) wrote: Hi Tom, I am really not a UI/UX person so I am all but useless for designing a Web Application or providing advice on how it should look or feel until it is done and I can use it. W.r.t your comment on re-branding, yes it would be nice for easier rebranding... but the functionality is more important than the aesthetics IMHO. OPSUI seems to throw stack traces all over the place at intermittent periods. This makes it difficult to work with reliably. I would really just like to see it work more reliably... The above is not very helpful I admit. It is however my opinion at this point in time. Lewis On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:09 PM <dev-digest-h...@oodt.apache.org> wrote: > > From: Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> > To: dev@oodt.apache.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:46:33 -0700 > Subject: React based OPSUI > Hi folks, > > I’m mocking and stubbing out ideas for a React based OPSUI. > > Its not designed to reinvent the wheel, but modernise, allow easier > theming/branding, be modular for people wanting to embed specific > components into apps and so on. > > I have plans in my head for a couple of extra screens for file management, > workflow management and I’ve still got work to do on the mocks, but here’s > a Balsamiq link for people to start to mull over: > > https://balsamiq.cloud/sgp43nx/pdsiadc > > If you were designing OPSUI again, whats missing? Anything? Nothing, just > needs to throw less stack traces? ;) > > > Cheers > > Tom > > -- > > > -- Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891. All engagements are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and its contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email.
