Cool Tom. I mean, for everything I said above, the Wireframe diagrams (if thats what they are referred to) looked insightful... as I said, I just don't quite have the knack for properly visualizing what is required. Lewis
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:51 PM Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote: > Functionality, is certainly core to what we do. > > My thinking behind the React stuff is accessibility for people who want to > develop OODT further or use it in existing projects. Standalone components > should be easier to integrate than a full web app, and for people just > wanting OPSUI functionality, this provides that but with (hopefully) a > lower barrier to entry for existing web developers who might be looking for > something interesting to get their teeth into. > > Whether that is the case or not, time will tell, but I do have a willing > band of volunteers wanting to help, so we’ll see where we get to. > > > > > On 18 October 2018 at 19:56:56, lewis john mcgibbney (lewi...@apache.org) > wrote: > > Hi Tom, > I am really not a UI/UX person so I am all but useless for designing a Web > Application or providing advice on how it should look or feel until it is > done and I can use it. > W.r.t your comment on re-branding, yes it would be nice for easier > rebranding... but the functionality is more important than the aesthetics > IMHO. > OPSUI seems to throw stack traces all over the place at intermittent > periods. This makes it difficult to work with reliably. I would really > just > like to see it work more reliably... > The above is not very helpful I admit. It is however my opinion at this > point in time. > Lewis > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:09 PM <dev-digest-h...@oodt.apache.org> wrote: > > > > > From: Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> > > To: dev@oodt.apache.org > > Cc: > > Bcc: > > Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:46:33 -0700 > > Subject: React based OPSUI > > Hi folks, > > > > I’m mocking and stubbing out ideas for a React based OPSUI. > > > > Its not designed to reinvent the wheel, but modernise, allow easier > > theming/branding, be modular for people wanting to embed specific > > components into apps and so on. > > > > I have plans in my head for a couple of extra screens for file > management, > > workflow management and I’ve still got work to do on the mocks, but > here’s > > a Balsamiq link for people to start to mull over: > > > > https://balsamiq.cloud/sgp43nx/pdsiadc > > > > If you were designing OPSUI again, whats missing? Anything? Nothing, > just > > needs to throw less stack traces? ;) > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Tom > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: > 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston > Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891. > > > All engagements are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. > This email and its contents are intended solely for the individual to whom > it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The > company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted > by this email. If you have received this message in error, please notify us > immediately by reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of > legal notice cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email. > -- http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
