> On June 8, 2016, 12:08 a.m., Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> > docs/src/site/twiki/CoordinatorFunctionalSpec.twiki, line 3240
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/48149/diff/1/?file=1403487#file1403487line3240>
> >
> >     instance -> instances. 
> >     
> >     Why wait for all dependant data available if min is specified?

If min and wait are specified then it means that I am ok to start processing if 
my minimum dependencies are met but I want to wait for more time to see if mora 
data arrives.

Ex. min = 2 and wait = 10 min and  data range = 5 and available = 4.
(min=2 and wait = 10) = false.
but after 10 min.
(min=2 and wait = 10) = true.


- Purshotam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48149/#review136504
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 8, 2016, 7:39 p.m., Purshotam Shah wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48149/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 8, 2016, 7:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Bugs: OOZIE-2445
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2445
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Doc for - Specifying coordinator input datasets in more logical ways 
> (OOZIE-1976)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/src/site/twiki/CoordinatorFunctionalSpec.twiki 
> 75b7354a12ae8c255b9d713856b44ec939092c95 
>   examples/src/main/apps/coord-input-logic/coordinator.xml 
> e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391 
>   examples/src/main/apps/coord-input-logic/job.properties 
> e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391 
>   examples/src/main/apps/coord-input-logic/workflow.xml 
> e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391 
>   src/main/assemblies/examples.xml d70c280ec6e189089dcacb57c6f6f340e77bec3b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48149/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Purshotam Shah
> 
>

Reply via email to