Let us explore changing the default hive version also to 1.x. 0.13 is old
Thanks
Venkat
On 7/15/16, 11:31 AM, "Robert Kanter" <rkan...@cloudera.com> wrote:
I don't think we have any guidelines defined anywhere about when it's okay
to change the minimum Java version, but perhaps we need to wait until the
next major release (5.0)? That said, Hadoop did this in a minor release
and Java 6 was EoL in 2013. So I'm fine with doing it in 4.3 if nobody has
an objections; we should just make sure to call that out in our release
notes.
Otherwise, nothing comes to mind for anything we should leave out other
than the Oozie on Yarn stuff, which is not currently in trunk anyway.
I know there's a number of Spark Action JIRAs; we should make sure to
include all of these and any pending ones.
@Rohini, @Puru, @Satish, anything you think needs more time to bake that we
should hold off on including in the release?
thanks
- Robert
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Abhishek Bafna <bafna.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any suggestions or comments on the scope for the release?
>
> Thanks,
> Abhishek
>
> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 3:07 AM, Abhishek Bafna <bafna.i...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Oozie is starting the release process for Oozie 4.3.0. This thread is
> for discussion about the scope of the release. Please provide your
> suggestion about what should be included (or any exclusions) in the
release.
> >
> > Currently, we have around 158 patches submitted to trunk. Based on the
> scope, we will include (exclude) more if required.
> > Version Upgrade
> > Java 1.7 (OOZIE-2036 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2036>)
> > OpenJPA (OOZIE-2488 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2488>),
> > Curator (OOZIE-2231 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2231
> >),
> > HttpClient (OOZIE-2538 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2538>),
> > Pig (OOZIE-2602 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2602>).
> > New Features/Improvements: Add default JT and NN, Database schema
> service check, instrumental metrics, Tomcat upgrade etc.
> > Bug Fixes.
> > Provide your opinion on inclusion/exclusion of the above points or more
> for the scope of the release. We can also, take some work which is already
> done and review is pending for them (depending on the availability of the
> reviewers).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Abhishek
>
>
