[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15677714#comment-15677714
]
Rohini Palaniswamy edited comment on OOZIE-2737 at 11/18/16 8:47 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
+1. Committed to master. Thank you [~andras.piros] and [~gezapeti] for
reviewing the patch. Thank you [~satishsaley] for fixing the issue.
was (Author: rohini):
Committed to master. Thank you [~andras.piros] and [~gezapeti] for reviewing
the patch. Thank you [~satishsaley] for fixing the issue.
> testConfigDefaultPropsToAction is flaky
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2737
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Satish Subhashrao Saley
> Assignee: Satish Subhashrao Saley
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-2737-1.patch, OOZIE-2737-2.patch
>
>
> - Error Message
> {code}
> expected:<[hdfs://localhost:60030]> but was:<[${nameNode}]>
> {code}
> - Stacktrace
> {code}
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestMapReduceActionExecutor
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 32.661 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> testConfigDefaultPropsToAction(org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestMapReduceActionExecutor)
> Time elapsed: 0.03 sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[hdfs://localhost:65506]> but
> was:<[${nameNode}]>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:85)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.oozie.action.hadoop.TestMapReduceActionExecutor.testConfigDefaultPropsToAction(TestMapReduceActionExecutor.java:150)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
> at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
> at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
> at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:83)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
