-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62470/#review186997
-----------------------------------------------------------




core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/JavaActionExecutor.java
Line 331 (original), 331 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62470/#comment263948>

    Would like to disagree with András Piros comment on creating yet another 
method in JavaActionExecutor. It does not make it clean. We should not be 
renaming method to include every step done inside the method. Adding default 
child env is still part of setting up the launcher config and it does not 
require special mention in the method name and a new method. I would suggest 
reverting back to old method name and overriding it as in the initial patch.



sharelib/spark/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/TestSparkActionExecutor.java
Lines 136 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62470/#comment263949>

    You can get rid of this and just use ArrayUtils.contains method from 
commons-lang


- Rohini Palaniswamy


On Oct. 3, 2017, 7:35 p.m., Satish Saley wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62470/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 3, 2017, 7:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Bugs: OOZIE-3062
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-3062
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> OOZIE-3062 Set HADOOP_CONF_DIR for spark action
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/JavaActionExecutor.java 
> be056038 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/SparkActionExecutor.java 
> 80d64ec8 
>   
> sharelib/spark/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/TestSparkActionExecutor.java
>  d97f1f06 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62470/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Satish Saley
> 
>

Reply via email to