-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67885/#review208310
-----------------------------------------------------------




core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/AsyncXCommandExecutor.java
Lines 1 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67885/#comment292140>

    Apache 2.0 license header missing.



core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/CallableQueueService.java
Lines 562 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67885/#comment292142>

    Typo: `by looking at the`



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestAsyncXCommandExecutor.java
Lines 75 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/67885/#comment292143>

    Remove newline


- András Piros


On Sept. 4, 2018, 12:05 p.m., Peter Bacsko wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67885/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 4, 2018, 12:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie, András Piros, Peter Cseh, Kinga Marton, and Robert 
> Kanter.
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See upstream JIRA for details
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/AsyncXCommandExecutor.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/CallableQueueService.java 
> ef8d58da5 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/util/PriorityDelayQueue.java 75c20698c 
>   core/src/main/resources/oozie-default.xml b69d2c9aa 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestAsyncXCommandExecutor.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/service/TestCallableQueueService.java 
> 9c2a11d6f 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67885/diff/9/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. Executed TestCallableQueueService which passed completely.
> 2. New unit tests for ASyncXCommandExecutor.
> 3. Tried it on a 3-node cluster
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter Bacsko
> 
>

Reply via email to