----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#review213519 -----------------------------------------------------------
docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md Lines 2642 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#comment299466> typo: unwanted docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md Lines 2645 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#comment299468> ozford comma: action, job, and ... docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md Lines 2646 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#comment299467> typo: previous docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md Lines 2650 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#comment299469> Have you tried to generate the HTML documentation? I assume we need a linebreak before the ``` ( I had similar problems during the twiki markdown conversion ). docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md Lines 2661 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#comment299470> Have you tried to generate the HTML documentation? I assume we need a linebreak before the ``` ( I had similar problems during the twiki markdown conversion ). docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md Lines 2670 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#comment299471> Have you tried to generate the HTML documentation? I assume we need a linebreak before the ``` ( I had similar problems during the twiki markdown conversion ). docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md Lines 2678 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/#comment299472> Have you tried to generate the HTML documentation? I assume we need a linebreak before the ``` ( I had similar problems during the twiki markdown conversion ). - Andras Salamon On March 7, 2019, 2:05 p.m., Mate Juhasz wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 7, 2019, 2:05 p.m.) > > > Review request for oozie, András Piros and Denes Bodo. > > > Bugs: OOZIE-1624 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1624 > > > Repository: oozie-git > > > Description > ------- > > OOZIE-1624 Exclusion pattern for sharelib. > > > Diffs > ----- > > core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/JavaActionExecutor.java > 231b38ea > core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/ShareLibExcluder.java > PRE-CREATION > core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/service/ShareLibService.java b88dab3a > > core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/ActionExecutorTestCase.java > 05511e4c > > core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/TestJavaActionExecutor.java > 6383e814 > > core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/TestJavaActionExecutorLibAddition.java > PRE-CREATION > core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/TestShareLibExcluder.java > PRE-CREATION > docs/src/site/markdown/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.md 7d6a31bf > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66656/diff/10/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested on a cluster > > > Thanks, > > Mate Juhasz > >
