BTW - I often use https://people.apache.org/committer-index.html to check identity.
Committers (including PMC members, as defined) do not always use their Apache email to vote and do not always count binding corrects. Best, tison. tison <[email protected]> 于2024年3月19日周二 22:22写道： > +cc Chris in case you don't subscribe this list. > > Best, > tison. > > > tison <[email protected]> 于2024年3月19日周二 22:21写道： > >> Hi Chris, >> >> Suyan=@suyanhanx (Apache ID) and is a PMC member of OpenDAL. >> >> > Morris Tai however is a committer and not a PMC member >> >> Yes. This is counted wrongly. >> >> > if for voting the names would be used >> >> I agree that either Apache ID or the public name should be used when >> sending the RESULT email so that it's easy for anyone to follow and cross >> check. >> >> Best, >> tison. >> >> >> Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 于2024年3月19日周二 22:03写道： >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> while going through your projects activity as part of my process of >>> reviewing the board reports for this week's board meeting, I noticed that I >>> count 4 votes, however in the result these are all counted as "binding" >>> votes. >>> >>> Morris Tai however is a committer and not a PMC member, so his vote >>> counts as +1, but not as binding +1 vote. And for Suyan, I couldn't really >>> find any PMC member or committer, that would fit that name. >>> >>> So if Suyan happens to be a PMC member, then all is ok, but if he/she is >>> not a PMC member, you quickly need to add a third binding +1 vote to that >>> release, or the release will have to be taken offline. >>> >>> In the future it would generally be good, if for voting the names would >>> be used, that we have on file in whimsy as otherwise it is really >>> challenging to allign votes and PMC members. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>
