I think we're ready to pull the trigger on 3.0
Thinks look pretty great: http://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJB/ejb-3-
roadmap.html
No service-ref support in OpenEJB standalone yet, I don't think
that's enough to hold us up though. Compliance-wise, we couldn't
look much better ;)
What do people think?
I can think of the interceptor issues that Prasad has raised, but
fixes for those could easily go into a 3.0.1, which based on passed
experience will likely have to rush out soon after people start
complaining about 3.0.0 :)
-David
On Mar 21, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Manu George wrote:
+1 for this idea as well
On 3/21/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/21/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:56 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>
> > Hi Dain...
> >
> > I like your idea, but IMHO I think we have to wait until we make
> > sure that
> > the minimum set of EJB3.0 features are implemented, by examining
> > the list
> > provided by DBlevins. Then we can make the OEJB3.0 release out to
> > the light.
>
> We should probably go through that list and decide what the must
> haves are and what we can do without.
>
> For example, IMHO we can do without the Validation, iTests, and
> Examples sections. We could definitely work on the validation part
> while people are giving us some initial feedback on the release
> content overall. I suspect user feedback might also how we
> prioritize completing the itests.
>
> Might be some other ones that aren't critical too.
>
> -David
+1 for this idea
> On 3/21/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we should just ship what we have now as "3.0". We
have tons
> >> of new exciting stuff and people can start working with it.
As they
> >> find issues we can release updates.
> >>
> >> I've been mainly working on the 2.x stuff and it is pretty
close to
> >> be fully complete, but I don't think it is worth waiting
around for
> >> some infrequently used features to be finished.
> >>
> >> -dain
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:15 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> >>
> >> > I've been wondering when we should start kicking some
releases from
> >> > the 3x branch out the door. I can't seem to come up with a
good
> >> > answer even in my own mind about when this should be.
> >> >
> >> > Seems we're doing really great as far as functionality and
> >> > implementing EJB3 is concerned. We still have a ways to
go, but
> >> > not too far actually.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Should we start shipping releases? If so what do we call
them and
> >> > when do we start? If not what do we need to get done?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts? (floor's open to all, committer or not)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -David
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks
> > - Mohammad Nour
>
>
--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
