+1 Based on the road-map results and my little experience with the release things, I think I can give +1 for that.
On 6/2/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we're ready to pull the trigger on 3.0 Thinks look pretty great: http://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJB/ejb-3- roadmap.html No service-ref support in OpenEJB standalone yet, I don't think that's enough to hold us up though. Compliance-wise, we couldn't look much better ;) What do people think? I can think of the interceptor issues that Prasad has raised, but fixes for those could easily go into a 3.0.1, which based on passed experience will likely have to rush out soon after people start complaining about 3.0.0 :) -David On Mar 21, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Manu George wrote: > +1 for this idea as well > > On 3/21/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 3/21/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:56 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Dain... >> > > >> > > I like your idea, but IMHO I think we have to wait until we make >> > > sure that >> > > the minimum set of EJB3.0 features are implemented, by examining >> > > the list >> > > provided by DBlevins. Then we can make the OEJB3.0 release out to >> > > the light. >> > >> > We should probably go through that list and decide what the must >> > haves are and what we can do without. >> > >> > For example, IMHO we can do without the Validation, iTests, and >> > Examples sections. We could definitely work on the validation part >> > while people are giving us some initial feedback on the release >> > content overall. I suspect user feedback might also how we >> > prioritize completing the itests. >> > >> > Might be some other ones that aren't critical too. >> > >> > -David >> >> >> +1 for this idea >> >> > On 3/21/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> I think we should just ship what we have now as "3.0". We >> have tons >> > >> of new exciting stuff and people can start working with it. >> As they >> > >> find issues we can release updates. >> > >> >> > >> I've been mainly working on the 2.x stuff and it is pretty >> close to >> > >> be fully complete, but I don't think it is worth waiting >> around for >> > >> some infrequently used features to be finished. >> > >> >> > >> -dain >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:15 PM, David Blevins wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > I've been wondering when we should start kicking some >> releases from >> > >> > the 3x branch out the door. I can't seem to come up with a >> good >> > >> > answer even in my own mind about when this should be. >> > >> > >> > >> > Seems we're doing really great as far as functionality and >> > >> > implementing EJB3 is concerned. We still have a ways to >> go, but >> > >> > not too far actually. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Should we start shipping releases? If so what do we call >> them and >> > >> > when do we start? If not what do we need to get done? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Thoughts? (floor's open to all, committer or not) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -David >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Thanks >> > > - Mohammad Nour >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
