Dain Sundstrom wrote: > If the version number isn't shared amongst all servers, then I would > think the version number will need to contain a server identifier to > avoid the case where the client fails over and old (dead) server > happened to be on the same version as the new server.
Why would this matter? If the client knows its failing over, it signals this and gets the whole list and the updated version number from the server. Is a server identifier really necessary? > > -dain
