David Blevins wrote: > > I guess we never really talked about how each server would get the list > of peers in the cluster. Depending on how we do that, we could return > to the md5'ed list idea but not the way it was proposed where the hash > would be calculated by both sides on every request -- at least that's > the way i read it.
Nah...I think we calculate it on the server when the cluster changes and that becomes the version number that is sent to the client. The client doesn't need to worry about any calculations, and the server will only test if the version has changed in order to send down a new copy of the version and list. Therefore its a calc that only happens very rarely. How does that sound? Jeff
