On Sep 15, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Below is a question regarding unassigned issues . Here is a scenario 1. "A" opens an issue and it is unassigned 2. "B" starts working on it (issue still unassigned) 3. "B" commits the change and fixes the issue. Now "B" wants to close the issue, does "B" have to assign the issue to himself first before closing it ? If not, then what is the value behind assigning an issue to "B" and then closing it (I think I have seen this happen in past commits)
Sorry, my brain read that last part as "should B assign to B, if not why should B assign to B"
What's the question? -David
