On Sep 15, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 9/15/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 15, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Karan Malhi wrote:
Below is a question regarding unassigned issues .
Here is a scenario
1. "A" opens an issue and it is unassigned
2. "B" starts working on it (issue still unassigned)
3. "B" commits the change and fixes the issue. Now "B" wants to
close
the issue, does "B" have to assign the issue to himself first before
closing it ? If not, then what is the value behind assigning an
issue
to "B" and then closing it (I think I have seen this happen in past
commits)
Sorry, my brain read that last part as "should B assign to B, if not
why should B assign to B"
What's the question?
To "B" or not to "B"... is the question :o)
Ha!
-David
